A layman’s thoughts on Matrix Receivers, Local Sidereal Time spikes in Anomalous Cognition (AC)
Compiled by Peace and Conflict Resolution.Org May 12, 2008 with continual updating,
by Rich Buckley, President.
No matter how you study cosmology, from Big Bang - Inflationary Theory or cyclic cosmology of String Theory, there is a profoundly important cosmological feedback function at work evidenced by remote viewing accessed and experienced daily by thousands of ordinary people, allowing our life form through structured protocol, to be aware of everything else through distant time and space. Sadly, science ignores all emperical evidence pretending the subject does not exist. "Feedback" to me suggests design by intent, as function serving purpose.
We know remote viewing exists. The unintentional consequence of this common experience of "feedback through remote viewing" is to fold an otherwise scientifically ignored, emperically experienced dimension as real as the experience of space-time, into a practical, unifying common experience. We have a "take it or leave it" unifying argument for "design by intent" regardless of faith or religion or level of agnosticism from which resolution among mankind might spring. Ultimately the common experience of remote viewing leads mankind to ask this question: Does it ever officially occur to the worlds' great religions that differences in practices that hold them all at odds become irrelevant in the face of emperical evidence of remote viewing of our unity?
Remote Viewing is real, going beyond subconscious visual imagery. Remote Viewing belongs in the public domain and science needs to work to account for its reality in our public domain’s cosmological model of the universe. We respectfully invite you to help map out possible answers to the physics of remote viewing. The author may be contacted through Buckley.Rich@gmail.com Please use the following subject line: Remote Viewing
The experience and exposure to remote viewing will bring you to discover much about yourself one way or the other. Science will have an incomplete cosmological model until the physics of remote viewing is understood. What are the physics behind remote viewing? The goal is to define a cosmological model that can also account for the reality of remote viewing or debunk remote viewing not for its moral or spiritual hazards but for its existence or non-existence, objectively, with observational proof, mathematical reason, without the need of malice or deception, in calm, reasoned discourse required through the scientific method. It's the 800 pound gorilla still in science's living room.
Three quotes and some irony:
-
"Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods." Albert Einstein
- "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein
- "When I hear people commenting about the reality of PSI, or whether or not it's just something happening in the imagination of the people involved. I wish they'd at least have the decency to read the history or actually review the data." ....."It's time to move on. Let's work toward figuring out why it's there at all, and how it works. It could be the single greatest understanding of humankind possible..." Josepth McMoneagle, Remote Viewer 001 US Army, Page 213, Memoirs of a Psychic Spy.
-
And some irony: Most likely your personal retirement fund in your 401-K managed by that highly respected third party manager you pay so dearly, well guess where they get some of their key investment information? Yup, you got it! Some of the investment trends that direct the flow of capital into your investments are derived from remote viewers. Your very own financial welfare is probably linked to some otherwise financially-ignorant remote viewer, sitting in a room giving input used in directing the flow of hundreds of billions of dollars part of which you own. Hello?
As it is likely each of the readers of this article will be both scientists and a product of one or the other of the world’s great religions, accept this thought should you proceed deeper: Hold on to what you believe. Be open to what you discover. Apply what you learn and when spiritually tested, I find it helps to confess and hold to this purpose “to seek truth and nothing more.”
About a year ago I read a great article translated from raw scientific research into English by an outstanding science editor covering break through research on energy flows during photosynthesis (See Quantum Secrets of Photosynthesis Revealed ). I draw some of my own speculation about Graham Flemming's LBL-UC Berkeley study as it applies to AC (Remote Viewing).
At the center of UC Berkeley Lab, Graham Flemings's research scientists discovered a unique characteristic about the carbon atom; it vibrates testing all possible vibration rates at the same time. This unique vibration is called “quantum vibration” meaning that the carbon atom vibrates at all possible computationally allowed rates of vibration. “Oscillations meeting and interfering constructively, forming wavelike motions of energy (superposition states) that can explore all potential energy pathways simultaneously and reversibly, meaning they can retreat from wrong pathways with no penalty.”
Why is quantum atomic vibration important? According to the article summary through inference, Carbon therefore enjoys the very high chances (in the later stage elements) of combining with other materials because the atomic vibrations allow it to physically probe its surroundings or pass along information and receive feedback with no loss of energy in the exchange. Through light excitation, all possible pathways can be sampled to find the most efficient pathway with no loss or penalty. Stuff tends to join with other stuff in our universe, at least at the atomic level, in normal conditions (not to include or exclude super gravity of black holes) when their vibrations harmonize and the combined energies of the other atoms stabilize. Status quo seems to settle in through efficiency.
It’s the discovery of this characteristic of the carbon atom to vibrate at all known frequencies at the same time, called "quantum vibration" that is special. As such, it is always in sync with everything else, potentially.
Could it be that remote viewing occurs best when some other measurable energy wave form harmonizes with our own carbon base (or disrupts the harmony or energy level within our carbon base)?
Maybe if we think of it in terms of signal on, signal off, in the simplest binary elemental level as it relates just to carbon in the human host, we find a format I would refer to as universal receiver (if it can be found). While it would not necessary decompose the carbon atom (or its host, the human body) as well as other plant life with just a really, really, really, really tiny (and harmonized) wave signal change, the carbon atom would likely be the atom to detect it best and for the human host. Could carbon be our built in receiver, at least the carbon in a part of our brain?
We know from Stephen Hawking’s book “A Briefer History of Time” that electrons read field strength instructions from the atomic nucleus and find harmonized energy levels from the composition of the nucleus. An electron trying to enter an atom that does not find available space at an inner level knows the space is not there because of disharmony in its ability to find synchronization within that atomic tier wave cycles, so it moves to an outer shell and tests its comfort at that level. Finding no comfort at that level means the signaling field forces from the nucleus are too weak, so the electron (or an electron in the event of substitution) moves on.
The energy wave or field we seek for Remote Viewing is somehow filtered into the process at the target (or the target's beacon or signal originator, ref Question #5 ) and exits the other end in the mind of the receiver, while able to seemingly pass through billions of miles of time difference distance (TDD). Surely there are a number of such energy-form candidates. When the signal enters our brain it does not destroy the carbon (or if not the carbon, the neuron assembly that enables cognitive awareness). (see comments, especially BREAKDOWN #4 on probability)
What type of wave energies other than photons of sunlight might energize carbon (or for that matter slightly de-energize) carbon? Isolate that energy-form and we might have the signal source for a universal tuner enabling remote viewing and eventually enabling much more. There has got to be some common mechanism built into each of us that enables us to translate from the so called space-time matrix into brain visualization. It’s probably carbon? That doesn’t explain how AC works; it just suggests a likely candidate for the basis of our neuron receptors: carbon.
The why it works might be simple: It’s a feedback mechanism within a space-time loop for every advanced life form to know about every other advanced life form once we evolve to the point of understanding.
Carbon is a late stage element and one should look to something even more primal in origin to describe matrix. But that’s another question entirely (explored below), going beyond a universal tuner for life forms.
(Note: various break-downs in this free wheeling reasoning)
Here follows more speculation on how the mind is able to access remote viewing probably through its carbon structure, at least the carbon structure in our brain, but more importantly this is speculation on how brain processed information can be seemingly transmitted throughout space and time, when (as an alternative) in most likelihood we already own the information and it is resident within us. Our built in vaults that retain our information are being updated by in-coming new data or may contain future events. These vaults remain out of science's visual reach currently and have surprising characteristics. Science only mathematically defines these vaults (dimensions) existence through String Theory as additional co-existent dimensions.
The notion of “quantum leap” referred to by Dr. Morehouse as he briefly describes by citing the work of physicists, seems so unfinished as to invite additional speculation. The model referred to by Morehouse suggests the four dimension path of an electron as it moves around the atomic core, flows in wave form. Its position from materialized Point A to materialized Point B in the pathway passes through all possible pathways (the notion of quantum movement) from Point A to reassemble (materialize) at measurable and expected, Point B.
So the question is what happens to the electron's wave energy in that quantum state or so-called quantum space, between Point A and Point B? “All possible pathways” is a rather powerful concept for the measurable energy within an electron. "All possible pathways" seems intuitively overstated since field strengths of energy fields always diminish with distance. The conjecture by the cited physicists went so far as to state that wave energy in quantum space was at every place possible. Intuitively, that doesn't work for me at least over great distances. So I look for an intuitive pathway through the scientific maze that seems to be supported by the scientifically verified evidence around us. I speculate that it remains more likely the field energies do dissipate even in quantum space and point instead to an alternative way for information in quantum space to be every where.
Shepherding Mirrors or Tunnels: LDTDs.
The term "quantum" has come to also mean that energy pathways can retain perfect flow without diminishment. Even still it’s more likely that some field strengths diminish in other dimensions over time and distance but not all field strengths necessarily diminish. Some may be boosted on with positive reinforcement from other dimensions and these filtered, accepted, alternate-dimension boosted waves serve remote viewing in some fashion.
It is worth noting that a corollary to Graham Fleming’s findings could be restated in this fashion: While the field strength of sunlight is diminished (inversely proportional to the square of the distance) once the photon of sunlight engages the carbon atom, its energy is converted to a wave form carried along and transmitted in the photosynthesis media “without loss” in a process described by Fleming: “Oscillations meeting and interfering constructively, forming wavelike motions of energy (superposition states) that can explore all potential energy pathways simultaneously and reversibly, meaning they can retreat from wrong pathways with no penalty.” While the energy may be the wave form of an electron, passing from atom to atom, the carbon's quantum vibration is the engine that enables the wave to perpetuate without loss among all pathways.
Look at what Fleming is telling us. We move from a dissipating energy field (sunlight) to a perfect perpetual field ("oscillations meeting and interfering constructively") while the state of energy is modified over into plant life. We go from dissipation to perfect perpetuation. This notion of dissipation to perfect perpetuation is the essence of the shepherding characteristics I am attempting to describe.
The "no penalty" means exactly that. It is worth noting that I read the actual lab results from Fleming's body of work and it was beyond my knowledge level to understand without the benefit of his lay language summary of study findings in English -- not that this admission might surprise the reader by this point.
There are at least four aspects to the term "quantum" : (1) Undiminishing, (2) All possible. (3) A huge amount or quantity difference in orders of magnitude. (4) The traditional partical physics definition meaning random variance of occurrences. Aspect (1), Undiminishing, could also be restated as Fleming's Corollary: Perfect Perpetuation.
The locked down tiny dimensions from String Theory (hereinafter LDTDs) I refer to, do not seem to necessarily violate the summary of the state of known physics as my speculative summary relates to (a) the state of physics I read in “A Briefer History of Time”, (b) what I have read about “String Theory," – Endless Universe, by Steinhardt and Turock, and (c) the entire great TV series called "The Universe" on the History Channel, none of which was presented in mathematics, but all of which was expressed in ordinary English with only the slightest definitional references in math terms. That's a pretty good set of filters for our current state of understanding all things considered, and brings us to within one or two years of what the broad public non-scientific domain professes to know about the state of astrophysics, cosmology, and the nature of our universe. The absence in the foregoing public arena of any official mention of remote viewing and its physics and the implication of remote viewing physics to the structure of the universe is noted.
These Locked Down Tiny Dimensions (LDTDs) might be serving as carrier or shepherding mirrors or tunnels, for everything in our 4 dimensional universe that comes into proximity with the event horizon of these dimensional envelopes.
How would the boundaries of a locked down tiny dimension appear to an energy wave from our 4-dimensional space-time universe (let's abbreviate 4-dimensional space-time universe as "4-D-U") approaching it and interacting with it, or attempting to interact with it?
We are told they are completely separate, but are they? It seems implied in the definition of alternate dimensions from String Theory these dimensions are operating at a power level a quantum leap still, beyond our own 4-D-U dimensional quantum vibrations levels of matter and wave form energy in our 4-D-U. We can and do indeed compute our quantum vibration levels in our 4-D-U dimensional universe. But we are no where near the power levels needed to read or measure the surface encounters and vibration rates of these tiny dimensions or their characteristics, except to try and mathematically construct their dimensions, and then try to balance our mathematical models with our observations. Our scientists in effect reach into the cutting edge of uncertain scientific fog with no sure footings armed with staggeringly complex mathematical constructions that seem to balance with observations. Nonetheless, science does assert through String Theory only, we seem to co-exist according to our physicists, with these LDTDs. So let's work with that notion. Let's work with these LDTD's.
Nature generally provides relationship answers for its processes if we look close enough and long enough. If sophisticated science can propose LDTDs exist, a layman can certainly propose why. The same holds for remote viewing and in this domain, intuition must be given its due.
I assume remote viewing is a real non-fantasy event. I dare say most physicists would not yet publicly support my statement. Studies indicate however, that physicists make some of the more reliable remote viewers, an irony that carries a level of humor.
Apparently unique to String Theory only, cosmologists calculate that LDTDs where theoretically shut down brief moments after the Big Bang. We hold only hypothetical knowledge of what might be inside of the LDTD's in the way of energy, matter, and information. The LDTD's could each still encapsulate the tremendous energies of that shut-down moment many billions of years ago, soon after the Big Bang. No doubt a better understanding of String Theory would help answer these hypothetical questions of what's inside the various hypothetical categories of LDTDs. Alas, the non-scientific manual on this matter has only recently been produced. Public awareness is very limited on this subject. Easier to understand computer enhanced animation will probably popularize String Theory soon.
Let's review. The heavens are filled with forces and energy moments after the Big Bang (or under String Theory, when dimensions collide) and then compartmentalized into multiple dimensions by those very forces. It seems reasonable those compartments, dwellings, dimensions, hold something and each exist with unique properties.
So again, how would the boundaries of a locked down tiny dimension appear to an energy wave from our 4-D-U-dimensional universe approaching it and interacting with it, or attempting to interact with it? Probably, with more likelihood than not, functions are at work in this co-existent relation between the LDTD's and our 4-D-U-dimensional, observed universe that works on principals we have not figured out.
What kind of principals are at work? We might deduce one or more.
In order for our universe to exist the way we think we see it, and this is an important point, the interaction of the energy wave from the 4-D-U and the LDTD would have to be either “reinforcement interaction” in nature or to use terms by Graham Fleming, the interaction with the Locked Down Tiny Dimensions (LDTD’s) would have to be a perfectly neutral interaction with characteristics that are “reversible” and “with no penalty.” This "no penalty" equates to perpetual, in perpetuity. The "no penalty" aspect of the use of the term quantum imparts a degree of rational perspective to the sustainable LDTDs I speculate serve as universal energy shepherding mirrors or tunnels.
Event horizon interaction with the LDTDs could not take on any other than these two states ("reinforcement interaction" or "without penalty - neutral" interaction) or 4-D-U-space-time could not exist in its present state as we think we are seeing it. Everything throughout the universe would just dissipate in upon itself faster than at a rate for which we could account, and things are not doing that. Just the opposite seems to be occurring. We're not dissipating in on ourselves; we are instead expanding at an accelerating rate.
Things would either have energy levels tomorrow less than what they have today or some other element or field force of existence would probably need to be changing in order to compensate in ways we could not measure: say the field of "time." If the average rate of passage of time for the entire 4-D-U universe altered its clock-rate, there would be no way to measure such an average change (currently). Yet this average clock rate change could be occurring. I assume there exist a constant average universal clock rate throughout our 4-D-U-universe altered by gravity pockets everywhere but with identical average universal clock rates tomorrow as exist today. Other unaccountable variables do exist that we do see and can measure.
There is at least one obvious exception to the unchanging universal average 4-D-U clock rate speculations above. All bets are off inside a LDTD. Time inside an LDTD may be irrelevant or operating on a completely altered clock rate to our 4-D-U clock rate, sort of like the notions associated with the clock rate of time inside a black hole.
What if one class of the LDTD's among the several reported by scientists, encapsulated bubbles of mass-time-gravity and were able to block the mass-time-gravity field from penetrating beyond its event horizon and its gravitational effects not able to escape through the boundary of the LDTD? What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas?
Even more intriguing, I would say intuitively logical, gravity may have its own ying and yang, positive and negative, twins separated soon after birth during the Big Bang as dimensions separated. What if the gravity field inside one type of the LDTD was an opposite gravity to our own, held in place by super-quantum-mechanical vibration energy of the of the event horizon of whatever makes up that event horizon? Maybe in order for such nonsense to occur, super-quantum-mechanical vibrations on the event horizons would need to vibrate faster than 10 to the power of minus 43rd per second.?
While gravity in some dimensions my be consistent and share the gravity in our 4-D-U dimension, there may be other dimensions with held-in-place gravity fields, positive in some, negative in others.
THE EVIDENCE
On the other hand, look at the possible evidence that space-time inside other categories of LDTDs are the compensator mediums that allow faster than the speed of light information transfer in our 4-D-U dimensions of space time, for some things such as our ability to Remote View. Science has to start accounting for these world wide real experiences.
Disciplining ourselves to account for the physics of Remote Viewing through at least computational theoretical physics may help us map the road closer to a unified field theory if it is ever to be found, a theory that we can all look upon and say, “There that does it.”
Doesn't if seem reasonable that LDTD's physics would be different inside an LDTD than the physics in our visible 4-dimensional space time? That's what science is telling us. There has got to be physics to explain remote viewing.
Let's track down some of the evidence we do have. What would be the consequences of the state of existence within our 4-D-U-dimensions if shepherding property of the LDTD’s where to give "positive reinforcement" to an approaching energy wave encountered on the LDTD event horizon as opposed to say complete "neutrality" to an approaching energy wave interacting with the event horizon of the LDTD?
Under positive reinforcement with LDTD encounter there would be produced some unaccountable, unexplainable, observations likely in our 4-dimensional space-time universe. So if we look around for some of those unaccountables, where might we see them?
Perhaps we do see unaccountables as Universal Expansion, Einstein’s frustrating notion of the Universal Constant or now our awakening studies around Dark Energy, and Dark Matter which we are learning to measure and describe, or, "remote viewing" (another way of getting or seeing from Point A at a given time and place to Point B at any other given point in time and place).
Dark Energy is in vogue just now. Dark Matter is reported to be 70% of the matter in the universe. Top billing goes to Dark Energy from all the cosmology talking heads. Science reports: We think everything is expanding at an accelerating rate because of Dark Energy and anti-gravity characteristics.
Or is it? Do we look deep enough? Maybe everything is expanding at an accelerating rate not so much because of Dark Energy as it is because the interaction between energy encounters with LDTDs receive a net positive reinforcement. LDTD may be the spring-load for universal expansion dark energy. LDTD interaction with our 4-D-U-dimensional universe may be the power generators of all the Dark Energy we observe the power-pumps through super-quantum-mechanical vibrations or perfectly pitched harmonies that on aggregate, accrete energy into our 4-D-U universe. There are observational ways we could check this, see below.
We can measure changes in Dark Energy to see if there is accretion of dark energy occurring. Do it the old fashion way. Locate galaxies further and further away that produce "lensing effects" (i.e. bending light when passing near a gravity field based on the strength of the gravity field; larger mass causing greater gravity and more lensing effects) based on their overall gravitational fields, then measure the lensing effects as we move further and further away looking back through time as it were. If we find a positive correlation of changing lensing effects with increased distance; that would be support the existence of Dark Energy accretion. If my speculation were correct, a far away galaxy should therefore be showing less dark energy on average compared to the close by galaxies of equal mass. Right? This would not only lend support to my speculation but add additional support to String Theory. Alas, I do not assign missions for our telescopes, but if I could this would be the undertaking of the next decade: Leap frog back 1-billion light years each jump back in time, locate galaxies each time preferably all of equal mass; compute its mass, measure its lensing effect and plot it on a simple graph of x-axis: Distance from Earth vs. y-axis: Measured Lensing Effect. Continue this process for as far back in time as possible jumping equal distances of 1-billion light years per jump. This should produce enough data points to nicely graph lower and lower lensing effects on equal mass galaxies thus supporting the idea that Dark Energy is accreting into each galaxy (our 4-D-U universe) and the logical conclusion would have to be it is coming from some positive reinforcement between LDTDs and our 4-D-U universe. Interestingly as each galaxy ages, there should be more and more energy being flung around causing faster and faster accretion of Dark Energy, sort of what we think we see occurring around 9-billions years ago when Dark Energy is apparently first large enough to be noted.
At least for remote viewing this positive reinforcement concept makes as good of sense as current theories. Filtered Information in one part of the universe would indeed be reinforced to reach any other part of the universe. There are kinks in this speculative reasoning (see end of page), but maps are made a piece at a time.
Looking closer for the different rules of physics for LDTD and taking it one level in closer to a wave energy encounter with the event horizon of a LDTD, these worlds (LDTD and 4-D-U) are probably separated with different rules of physics or common rules of physics, if it makes the reader feel better, separated by additional rules of physics we have not yet mastered.
The most common form of separation in our 4-D-U-universe is wave vibration rates. If a pattern becomes disruptive to energy balance, something happens. But the most common thing to happen is to protect and defend the status quo. A strong case can be made that the universe is violent and chaotic. An equally strong case can be made that the tendency to retain the status quo is inherent in the life force and its building blocks.
Likely as not, the same rules on a different scale of many orders of magnitude exist at the LDTD boundary with an additional level of quantum-mechanical vibration on the event horizon (and throughout the LDTD) of each of the LDTD’s, protecting the LDTD's status quo. This would seem probable and necessary that such a different set of physical rules (LDTD-Interface Rules) would indeed exist at the interface between these dimensions, otherwise they would not be separate dimensions (Side Issue: Could these Interface Rules be computationally proven so as to balance with existing String Theory?).
Pause right here because this is the point I’m attempting to make: On each of the event horizons of each of the LDTD’s, there could exist all information since right after the Big Bang from the commencement of Phase 3 (see below) and constantly being updated with new input. Let's review the state of what we think we know about the universe's life cycle: Phase 1: The Big Bang, (or 100-car pile-up under String Theory of two different dimensions colliding in multiple spots) Phase 2: followed by dense singularity with all dimensions open, Phase 3: followed by separations of dimensions into the 4-D-U-dimensions we experience (time dimension + the three directional dimensions) and the other LDTD's. Phase 4: Still Conjecture- stick around.
Under String Theory, physicists have computed that to reopen the LDTDs require energy levels far greater than we can currently produce to merge again with our 4-dimensions, back into the higher energy state of singularity in the Phase 2 state of the universe life cycle.
We exist in our current multi-billion year Phase 3 where our 4-dimensions are separated from the other LDTD dimensions. From the moment of dimensional separation on, the beginning of Phase 3, the LDTD’s held-in-place incredibly fast, unimaginably powerful quantum vibrations on their event horizons, and started gathering new information of all post-separation meaningful data. It would seem less than surprising to discover that LDTD’s horizon boundaries vibrate at rates and energy levels so high that it would put all our notions of quantum-mechanical vibrations (let's call these vibration rates on the event horizon on the LDTD's: super-quantum-mechanical or just super-quantum rates) out of range of every vibration rate in our 4-dimensional universe except for one LDTD vibration characteristic: The LDTD's can always find perfect harmony with all known quantum vibration rates of matter and wave form energy in our 4-D-U-dimensional universe at our current energy levels of our 4-D-U-dimensional universe.
LDTD's cause a positively re-enforced reflection of filtered and accepted signal on a super-quantum scale so dense, and at such high rates of information transfer, that each meaningful speck of data at each quantum moment of time (back up in our 4-D-U-dimensional universe) is reinforced and sent on to a receiver, where ever such receivers exist ……say like a matrix of carbon atoms in a life form brain and other neuron elements.
If you were a transcendent power this inter-galactic, trans-universal form of information transfer would fill some pretty neat functions telling you how everything, everywhere, past, present, and future, are progressing and you don't even have to pay basic service charges of $49 per month.
Look again at some of the evidence all around us. The collective aggregation of positive reinforcement interactions (between LDTDs and 4-D-U energy) would be for their net aggregate to inject energy into our 4-D-U-dimensional observed universe by some unaccountable, unexplainable observations. The observation would likely cause us to ponder “where the heck is that energy coming from?” This of course is just exactly where astrophysics is today posing the 100 year old question raised first by Dr. Hubble and others: Why is the universe expanding at an increasing rate?
With government sources readily discussing the successful use of Remote Viewing in so many fields (law enforcement, business, national security, search and rescue, even your 401-K investment choices), the credibility of science is weakened by its reluctance for undertaking formal public study of Remote Viewing physics into a comprehensive working model of our universe. Why can’t physicists seeking PhD certification be required to understand remote viewing an< xml="true" ns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" prefix="st1" namespace="">
The best group within science to undertake this effort to publicly account for the reality of remote viewing and the physics supporting the phenomenon might be (a) the most respected, broadly published, creative members who have already made their mark, or (b) holding an endowed chair with tenure and able to influence where we point our telescopes, or (c) those who understand the time has come and the world is ready.
If you are reading this post it's because you are just such a candidate.
Ultimately the remote viewing experience leads mankind to ask this question: Does it ever officially occur to this worlds' great religions that the differences in practices that keep them all at odds may well be irrelevant to God? And if so, what should we do about it?